search instagram arrow-down



Bin da auf eine Geschichte der britischen BBC gestoßen. Muss einfach einen Eintrag darüber schreiben.

Auch ich war ein stolzer Besitzer eines Walkmans. Meiner hatte sogar einen Radioempfänger, so konnte ich sogar Radio hören. Und meine Kassettensammlung war umfangreich. Die meisten habe ich sogar noch.

Ich gebe zu mit MP3 ist alles einfacher geworden, aber wie mit allen neuen, schnellen und einfachen Dingen geht was dabei verloren. Mensch, ich habe Stunden damit verbracht Musik vom Radio mitzuschneiden und mich jedesmal geärgert, wenn der Depp von Moderator ins Ende gelabert hat. Da konnte man alles wieder löschen. Und so einfach seinen Lieblingssong zu bekommen war auch nicht ohne. Die TOP 20 oder Oldiesparade war ganz oben auf meiner Hörliste.

Wengistens kann ich behaupten, ich war dabei, wenn die Musik laufen lernte.

Und wo ist da jetzt die Verbindung zu Australien? Nun, wir haben uns in Australien eine iPod gekauft und schon etliche CD’s um diesen zu füttern. Auch wir gehen mit der Zeit.

[Update 03.02.2021 – Ich sage nur ein Wort – Spotify]


When the Sony Walkman was launched, 30 years ago this week, it started a revolution in portable music. But how does it compare with its digital successors? The Magazine invited 13-year-old Scott Campbell to swap his iPod for a Walkman for a week.When the Sony Walkman was launched, 30 years ago this week, it started a revolution in portable music. But how does it compare with its digital successors? The Magazine invited 13-year-old Scott Campbell to swap his iPod for a Walkman for a week.My dad had told me it was the iPod of its day.He had told me it was big, but I hadn’t realised he meant THAT big. It was the size of a small book.When I saw it for the first time, its colour also struck me. Nowadays gadgets come in a rainbow of colours but this was only one shade – a bland grey. LISTEN UP TEENAGERS… THE CLASSIC WALKMAN EXPLAINEDSony Walkman1: Clunky buttons2: Switch to metal (that’s a type of cassette, not heavy rock music)3: Battery light – usually found flickering in its death throes4: Double headphone jack (not to be found on an iPod)5: Door ejects – watch out for flying tapes and eye injuries
Walkman v iPod: Scott’s verdict. So it’s not exactly the most aesthetically pleasing choice of music player. If I was browsing in a shop maybe I would have chosen something else.From a practical point of view, the Walkman is rather cumbersome, and it is certainly not pocket-sized, unless you have large pockets. It comes with a handy belt clip screwed on to the back, yet the weight of the unit is enough to haul down a low-slung pair of combats.When I wore it walking down the street or going into shops, I got strange looks, a mixture of surprise and curiosity, that made me a little embarrassed.As I boarded the school bus, where I live in Aberdeenshire, I was greeted with laughter. One boy said: „No-one uses them any more.“ Another said: „Groovy.“ Yet another one quipped: „That would be hard to lose.“My friends couldn’t imagine their parents using this monstrous box, but there was interest in what the thing was and how it worked.In some classes in school they let me listen to music and one teacher recognised it and got nostalgic.It took me three days to figure out that there was another side to the tape. That was not the only naive mistake that I made; I mistook the metal/normal switch on the Walkman for a genre-specific equaliser, but later I discovered that it was in fact used to switch between two different types of cassette.  I managed to create an impromptu shuffle feature simply by holding down ‚rewind‘ and releasing it randomly  Another notable feature that the iPod has and the Walkman doesn’t is „shuffle“, where the player selects random tracks to play. Its a function that, on the face of it, the Walkman lacks. But I managed to create an impromptu shuffle feature simply by holding down „rewind“ and releasing it randomly – effective, if a little laboured.I told my dad about my clever idea. His words of warning brought home the difference between the portable music players of today, which don’t have moving parts, and the mechanical playback of old. In his words, „Walkmans eat tapes“. So my clumsy clicking could have ended up ruining my favourite tape, leaving me music-less for the rest of the day.Digital relief. Throughout my week using the Walkman, I came to realise that I have very little knowledge of technology from the past. I made a number of naive mistakes, but I also learned a lot about the grandfather of the MP3 Player.You can almost imagine the excitement about the Walkman coming out 30 years ago, as it was the newest piece of technology at the time. The Walkman was a nostalgic sight for Scott’s parents. Perhaps that kind of anticipation and excitement has been somewhat lost in the flood of new products which now hit our shelves on a regular basis.Personally, I’m relieved I live in the digital age, with bigger choice, more functions and smaller devices. I’m relieved that the majority of technological advancement happened before I was born, as I can’t imagine having to use such basic equipment every day.Having said all that, portable music is better than no music.Now, for technically curious readers, I’ve directly compared the portable cassette player with its latter-day successor. Here are the main cons, and even a pro, I found with this piece of antique technology.SOUNDThis is the function that matters most. To make the music play, you push the large play button. It engages with a satisfying clunk, unlike the finger tip tap for the iPod.When playing, it is clearly evident that the music sounds significantly different than when played on an MP3 player, mainly because of the hissy backtrack and odd warbly noises on the Walkman.The warbling is probably because of the horrifically short battery life; it is nearly completely dead within three hours of firing it up. Not long after the music warbled into life, it abruptly ended.


With the plethora of MP3 players available on the market nowadays, each boasting bigger and better features than its predecessor, it is hard to imagine the prospect of purchasing and using a bulky cassette player instead of a digital device. Furthermore, there were a number of buttons protruding from the top and sides of this device to provide functions such as „rewinding“ and „fast-forwarding“ (remember those?), which added even more bulk.As well as this, the need for changing tapes is bothersome in itself. The tapes which I had could only hold around 12 tracks each, a fraction of the capacity of the smallest iPod.Did my dad, Alan, really ever think this was a credible piece of technology?“I remembered it fondly as a way to enjoy what music I liked, where I liked,“ he said. „But when I see it now, I wonder how I carried it!“ WALKMAN 1, MP3 PLAYER 0But it’s not all a one-way street when you line up a Walkman against an iPod. The Walkman actually has two headphone sockets, labelled A and B, meaning the little music that I have, I can share with friends. To plug two pairs of headphones in to an iPod, you have to buy a special adapter. Another useful feature is the power socket on the side, so that you can plug the Walkman into the wall when you’re not on the move. But given the dreadful battery life, I guess this was an outright necessity rather than an extra function.

Nachtrag 02.07.2019:  Es war der 30. Geburtstag des Walkmans, wo ich diesen eingestellt hatte. Und heute ist er 40 Jahre alt geworden.


This entry was posted in 2009.

One comment on “Walkman versus iPod

Kommentar verfassen
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s

Diese Seite verwendet Akismet, um Spam zu reduzieren. Erfahre, wie deine Kommentardaten verarbeitet werden..